|
Having
passed my sixty-fifth
birthday, and practiced
and taught Aikido
for more than thirty
years, qualifies
me as an "old
Aikidoist".
"Ruminations"
may be defined as
the meandering and
crisscrossing of
thoughts that might
not prove too productive
or useful. The reader
has now been warned;
continue at your
own risk.
|
When
I first began Aikido practice
I tried to convince everyone
I met of its value. Family,
friends, and acquaintances
would shudder at my approach.
But, over the years, I
found myself talking less
and less about Aikido
- and having some doubts
about the things I was
saying. Let me quote from
an article written by
Y. Yamada, Shihan, and
President of the United
States Aikido Federation,
in the Spring/Summer 1995
Aikido East journal:
"... Even though
I'm an Aikido expert,
I don't know police self-defense
techniques, that's their
field. I don't mind Aikido
instructors teaching police
self-defense instructors
the techniques of aikido,
but let police experts
make the necessary adjustments
for them to teach their
students. It's okay to
share your Aikido knowledge,
but don't believe that
you are capable of teaching
self-defense; it's a completely
different skill. I see
some danger in using Aikido
this way, because pure
Aikido technique has nothing
to do with combat self-defense
without knowledge or advice
from other self-defense
experts. If I were asked
to teach the police, I
would make clear beforehand
that what I am going to
teach is just aikido and
ask them to make their
adjustments according
to their needs."
The above comment was
unsettling, as I had considered
Aikido a Martial Art,
based on self-defense
techniques, modified to
prevent serious permanent
injury to one's attacker.
What I was initially taught,
and continue to teach,
are defense techniques
against various attacks.
And this is what took
place in my classes with
Yamada, Sensei. But maybe
I was missing something
by focusing in on the
mechanics of the techniques
- that there was something
else underlying the obvious
throws and pins. This
related to another gnawing
question I had about the
name "Aikido".
The Japanese translation
of Aikido is "The
Path of harmony with the
life force of the universe".
It does not mention fighting
techniques; nor to winning
or losing. Kisshomaru
Uyeshiba, the son of the
founder of Aikido, began
his book, Aikido, with
the following first paragraph:
Aikido is The Way of Chivalrous
(or Martial) Spiritual
Harmony. The Master, Morihei
Uyeshiba, originated it
after having spent many
years of research, practice
and development. Aikido
is the art of assimilation
and unification with Nature.
There is no duality, no
struggle, no opponent.
There is only a harmonious
action of our own spirit
with the spirit of the
universe. The techniques
of Aikido are the bodily
realization of this harmony.
My task now seems to be
to use the obviously effective
self-defense techniques,
originated by O'Sensei,
as a means of aligning
my spirit with the spirit
of the universe. This
was definitely not my
original goal, or understanding,
of Aikido. An analogy
comes to mind: in music
one learns notes not to
play notes, but to play
music. The individual
notes are not the melody,
rhythm, tempo, or phrasing
of beautiful music.
My first twenty years
of training was spent
learning the basic Aikido
techniques. Constant repetition
allowed for a gradual
shift in understanding
from the "conceptual"
to the physical. Instead
of thinking about how
a technique should be
performed (as I was doing
it), I allowed the built
in habits to determine
the movements. The body
seemed to know where it
was supposed to go; "I"
could relax and watch
the performance. The "performance"
contained the balance,
straight posture, hanmi
stance; all the basics
I had worked on over the
previous years. As I became
more confident, I could
be more relaxed. Being
relaxed I became more
sensitive to the lines
of attack and could blend
more easily with my Uke
(attacker). This may be
the harmony I was searching
for.
Let me "meander"
down a different path
for a moment; that of
Physiological Psychology.
Brain functioning is sometimes
classified according to
whether it is controlled
by the left hemisphere
or the right hemisphere.
The left side of the brain
is related to the right
side of the body while
the "right brain"
controls the left side.
There is a further differentiation;
one side controls language
with its symbols and concepts
while the other is more
spatial, "artistic",
feeling oriented. I would
imagine that the "language
hemisphere" learned
Aikido first - with all
its exactness of bodily
posture, etc. That was
a more mechanically oriented
Aikido. Next it had to
become modulated by the
nonverbal, feeling, flowing
side that has its own,
very different agenda.
There must be some kind
of interchange, or communication
within the brain, leading
to a more integrated,
complete level of functioning.
On a physiological level,
that is the function of
the corpus callosum, the
sheet of tissue separating,
as well as joining the
left and right hemispheres
of the brain.
When I was younger, the
"spiritual"
aspect of Aikido was relatively
unimportant. That was
a realm that could not
be observed, measured,
and controlled. Science
had little use for this
illusive, "primitive",
fantasy realm that could
not be validated through
experimentation. That
was the "Left brain"
devaluing the domain of
the "Right brain".
The nonverbal brain deals
with what can be sensed
but is not quantifiable;
love, beauty, peacefulness,
and awe, are some of the
most moving human emotions
that are beyond description
- though very real. In
Aikido, the spiritual,
may have been O'Sensei's
description of Right brain
experience in Left-brain
language. This is impossible
because they are qualitatively
different; as if trying
to explain color in monochromatic
terms. Language, with
words, attempt to describe
reality - but they are
a step removed from the
actual sensual experience.
Immediate experience is
a right brain function.
The left-brain thinks
and plans Aikido techniques;
the right brain is where
they actually exist in
the momentary ever-moving
instant we call "now"
(the immediate present).
In Left Brain Aikido,
there is a separate attack
that must be met with
a defensive technique.
Right Brain Aikido perceives
attack and defense as
a single movement; Nage
is the other side of Uke's
attack. They are joined,
connected, and move as
one. This seems consistent
with that first description
of Aikido by Kisshemaru
Uyeshiba, Aikido is the
art of assimilation and
unification with Nature.
There is no duality, no
struggle, no opponent.
There is only a harmonious
action of our own spirit
with the spirit of the
universe. The techniques
of Aikido are the bodily
realization of this harmony.
I'd like to end at this
point by offering my deepest
respect to O'Sensei, and
all his students, who
have passed along the
fruits of his genius and
made my life so much richer
and meaningful. May all
Aikido students discover
their own unique expression
of the meaning of Aikido
in joyful practice.
by
by Howard Pashenz, Ph.D
 |
|
|
 |
|